Board Thread:Wiki Proposals/@comment-26174097-20160326175615/@comment-26087431-20160328022214

Both sides of this disagreement have good points, although I have to say I do prefer Aj's side. Admins, it's your wiki, if you know that something is not racist and no one is doing anything wrong, why should it matter if there are a couple misinformed individuals who think otherwise? The bottom line is not what a few outliers may think, what matters is if it's true or not.

Is it racist, or not? If so, then that's a problem, despite what some others may think, it should be fixed. If not, despite what some others may think, there is no one at fault, so it shouldn't be addressed as a valid claim.

However, I also see the point that some people could jump to conclusions and see that kind of a conversation as racist, and to avoid conflict, would be a good reason for deleting it just in case.

It's about whether the admins think that the possible outcome is worth worrying about.