Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-24619563-20160921004026/@comment-25203954-20160921023543

Voted!

So, this is just a disclaimer that what I am about to say is in NO way meant to influence people's voting and isn't meant to be disrespectful to our current bureaucrat, but I feel I need to say it:

Another reason that was not listed above is how Disnick ranked/rated/commented on user's applications, when he was not a bureaucrat and was not in the position to do that. The user's application he claimed was "decent" told me that he felt bad about how Disnick ranked his application like that, and that it was wrong, especially since he wasn't in the position to accept/deny apps in the first place. (The user will remain anonymous, as I don't want to put him on the spot)

One more reason: When users were accepted into adminship, he said things like "He/She is going to work well with our other administrators", once again, as if he were a bureaucrat. (Don't ask for proof of that because it's a big wiki, and I'm not going to spend my time hunting down something small like this)

Just another reason, but this is not a way to persuade or influence people's votes, just a couple reasons I felt were important left out. :)

-Dbz